The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality by Joseph.
The authority of law: essays on law and morality Author(s) Joseph Raz Date 1979 Publisher Clarendon Pub place Oxford ISBN-13 9780191681400, 9780198253457 eBook. Access the eBook. Open eBook in new window. Format electronic book.
This classic collection of essays, first published in 1979, has had an enduring influence on philosophical work on the nature of law and its relation to morality. Raz begins by presenting an analysis of the concept of authority and what is involved in laws claim to moral authority. He then develops a detailed explanation of the nature of law and legal systems, presenting a seminal argument for.
This essay was selected for publication as a highly distinguished essay that was written for assessment as a part of the unit Legal Theory and Research at Murdoch Univeristy. 1 Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford University Press, 1979) 211.
The authority of law: essays on law and morality By Raz, Joseph. Book. English. Published Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979. This revised edition of one of the classic works of modern legal philosophy, first published in 1979, represents Raz's landmark contribution which has. Sorted by Refine Your Search.
The authority of law: essays on law and morality By Raz, Joseph.. This revised edition of one of the classic works of modern legal philosophy, first published in 1979, represents Raz's landmark contribution which has. Ethics in the public domain: essays in the morality of law and politics By Raz, Joseph. Book.
Leslie Green suggests that somebody who insists on the separability of law and morality will be obscuring the fact that law is not a non-moral phenomenon. See Green, Leslie, “ Legal Positivism ” in Zalta, Edward, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).
Inseparability of Law and Morality 3 associate with statutory law,”9 and he wanted it to give solace to trial judges who have expertise in commerce but find themselves under the thumb of a Supreme Court with no business sense.10 Legal positivism’s laxity about such things agitated him: “What.